Which reliability measures are known to test for equivalence?

The measures of reliability that test for equivalence ensure that different versions of a test or different raters yield consistent results. Each of the reliability types listed evaluates various aspects of how performance can be consistent across different scenarios.

Regarding parallel or alternate-form reliability, this method involves creating two different forms of a test that measure the same construct. When both tests are administered to the same group, the results are compared to assess if they produce similar outcomes. This provides evidence that different forms of the test are equivalent in what they measure.

Test-retest reliability evaluates the consistency of a measure over time. While primarily focused on temporal stability, it also implies equivalence if the same test is given multiple times, and the results are consistent. This ensures that an individual's score reflects a stable characteristic rather than being influenced by external variables at the time of testing.

Interrater reliability involves multiple raters assessing the same phenomenon. High interrater reliability indicates that different observers are providing consistent ratings or judgments, which suggests that their assessments are equivalent.

Thus, all these reliability measures address the fundamental aspect of equivalence in terms of maintaining consistency in the measurement outcomes across different forms, times, or evaluators. Therefore, the answer encompasses all the mentioned reliability types, confirming the robustness