Which feature distinguishes an integrative review from other types of literature reviews?

An integrative review is specifically characterized by its systematic approach to synthesizing literature from various types of studies, including both quantitative and qualitative research. This method allows the reviewer to comprehensively analyze and integrate findings from disparate studies, which can enhance understanding of a particular issue, theory, or phenomenon in nursing and health care.

The systematic approach involves clearly defined objectives, rigorous methodological processes for data collection and analysis, and a thorough examination of the body of literature, making it distinct from other types of reviews that might lack such stringent criteria. By employing this systematic methodology, an integrative review can provide insights that are more robust and applicable to practice, policy, or further research.

In contrast to other review types, integrative reviews are not restricted to either qualitative or quantitative data, distinguishing them from reviews that may focus solely on one form of research. This inclusivity is essential to provide a holistic view of the topic under consideration, which is key to developing well-rounded conclusions and recommendations.