What term describes the adequacy of information that leads the reader from the research question to interpretation of findings?

The term that describes the adequacy of information leading the reader from the research question to the interpretation of findings is known as auditability. This concept ensures that the research process is transparent and allows others to follow the decision-making and analytical journey taken by the researchers. By documenting the methodology and decisions made throughout the research process, auditability provides a clearer understanding of how conclusions were derived from the data, which helps in validating the research findings for readers.

Transferability refers to the degree to which research findings can be transferred or applied in other contexts or situations. While this can be important, it doesn’t specifically describe the pathway from the research question to findings.

Equity generally pertains to fairness and justice in research practices, particularly with regard to study subjects and ethical considerations, which is not the focus of the question.

Generalizability refers to the extent to which research findings can be generalized from the sample to a larger population. While it is related to the applicability of findings, it does not address the specific process of leading a reader from the research question through to interpretation as auditability does.

Thus, the focus on auditability highlights the significance of having a well-documented and transparent research process for accurate interpretation of findings.